Liability only vs Full coverage
Updated for plan year 2026
In short
The core difference: liability-only insurance pays for the other party when you're at fault but nothing for your own car, while 'full coverage' adds collision and comprehensive to also repair or replace your vehicle. 'Full coverage' isn't a policy type; it's just liability plus those two add-ons, and it doesn't mean everything is covered. The right choice comes down to a single number: how much your car is worth relative to what the extra coverage costs.
Side by side
| Dimension | Liability only | Full coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Covers other people | Yes, injuries and their property | Yes, same liability portion |
| Covers your own car | No | Yes, collision and comprehensive |
| Cost | Cheapest option | Higher: you're paying to insure your car |
| Required by lenders | Not enough on a financed car | Usually required while you have a loan |
| Best for | Older, low-value, paid-off cars | Newer or financed cars |
When Liability only wins
Go liability-only once your car's value drops low enough that collision and comprehensive stop paying off, generally when their combined annual premium tops about 10% of what you'd actually collect. On a paid-off older car, dropping those coverages and banking the premium often beats insuring it. Just never cut liability itself; that's the coverage that protects everything you own.
When Full coverage wins
Keep full coverage when your car is newer, financed (lenders require it), or valuable enough that you couldn't comfortably replace it out of pocket. The collision-and-comprehensive portion earns its cost while the car is worth well more than the premium. Reassess every year or two as the value falls.
The bottom line
'Full coverage' is worth it while your car is worth insuring; liability-only wins once it isn't. Run the 10% rule on collision and comprehensive, but always carry strong liability limits either way.